Electoral college.

The Electoral College frame works well in tight alternatives. However, the call for reform is heard after almost all(prenominal) election. on that point are three major weaknesses in the ashes that could affect the issue of an election. Winner take all is the main problem pop of these three. If a offerdidate evolves the lifesizest number of popular right to pick outs in a state, that person suck ups all the states electoral votes most of the time. In the rare case, a vista will scarce give in for part of the electoral votes. Critics argue that this arrangement is unfair to those who voted for a losing raftdidate. For example, in 1992 more than 2 million Texans voted for Bill Clinton, only when Clinton did not realise any of Texass electoral votes. He recognized 2 million votes from the popular; however, he did not receive any of the electoral votes out of 32. 32 of the electoral votes can play a significant role in the election. Sometimes, the medical progno sis would only get along by a margin vote like 1 or 2.That why many potful are criticizing this system. Also the winner take all system makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote. This usually happens when a candidate wins several monumental states by narrow margins. Totally, there were eighteen times in the American History.

The first time was in the elections of John Quincy Adams in 1824. He only stock 30.6% of the popular; however, he acquire most of the electoral votes, 84 votes. So he at last became the president. That is really often happened. The last time happe ned was the election in 2000. George W. Bush! only received 47.9% of popular votes only he received 271 out of 538 electoral votes. So he conform to the constitutional requirement, majority of electoral... If you want to get a luxuriant essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay